[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0e76ff0-0f31-c3fd-79a3-3455861989e7@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 16:45:17 +0100
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] backlight: report error on failure
On 06/05/17 19:00, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> It is possible to update the backlight power and the brightness using
> the sysfs and on writing it either returns the count or if the callback
> function does not exist then returns the error code 'ENXIO'.
>
> We have a situation where the userspace client is writing to the sysfs
> to update the power and since the callback function exists the client
> receives the return value as count and considers the operation to be
> successful. That is correct as the write to the sysfs was successful.
> But there is no way to know if the actual operation was done or not.
>
> backlight_update_status() returns the error code if it fails. Pass that
> to the userspace client who is trying to update the power so that the
> client knows that the operation failed.
>
> This is not a change of ABI as the userspace expects an error of ENXIO,
> after this patch the range of errors that are returned to the userspace
> will increase.
This comment is wrong, no code path through
backlight_device_set_brightness() can possibly return ENXIO.
My review comment to v1 was:
> Strictly speaking this is an ABI change. Its probably a harmless one
> making it ok to change but I'm interested what testing or code review
> you've done to be sure the userspace doesn't do odd things if the
> kernel starts to pass through errors.
I find myself somewhat surprised to find the above review comment
addressed by adding text to the patch header denying that there is a
change of ABI...
Daniel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
> ---
>
> v3: remove rc = 0, and update rc with count in else condition.
> v2: update power with old value on failure.
>
> Copy-pasting from the last patch conversation:
>
> The problem that prompted me to send this patch is the current project
> that I am working on now. And we faced this there. The userspace code is
> writing to the sysfs node to poweron the backlight and reported success.
> But sometimes we noticed that backlight was not actally powered on. And
> that lead me to check the code and noticed that it is swallowing all the
> errors.
>
> drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> index 288318a..0289107 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static ssize_t bl_power_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> {
> int rc;
> struct backlight_device *bd = to_backlight_device(dev);
> - unsigned long power;
> + unsigned long power, old_power;
>
> rc = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &power);
> if (rc)
> @@ -145,10 +145,15 @@ static ssize_t bl_power_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> if (bd->ops) {
> pr_debug("set power to %lu\n", power);
> if (bd->props.power != power) {
> + old_power = bd->props.power;
> bd->props.power = power;
> - backlight_update_status(bd);
> + rc = backlight_update_status(bd);
> + if (rc)
> + bd->props.power = old_power;
> + } else {
> + rc = count;
> }
> - rc = count;
> + rc = rc ? rc : count;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&bd->ops_lock);
>
> @@ -176,8 +181,7 @@ int backlight_device_set_brightness(struct backlight_device *bd,
> else {
> pr_debug("set brightness to %lu\n", brightness);
> bd->props.brightness = brightness;
> - backlight_update_status(bd);
> - rc = 0;
> + rc = backlight_update_status(bd);
> }
> }
> mutex_unlock(&bd->ops_lock);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists