lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170508161711.GL2222@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 May 2017 13:17:11 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To:     Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Yao Jin <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf report: distinguish between inliners in the same
 function

Em Mon, May 08, 2017 at 10:45:18AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> On Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 23:35:36 CEST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > When different functions get inlined into the same function, we
> > want to show them individually in the reports. But when we group by
> > function, we would aggregate all IPs and would only keep the first
> > one in that function. E.g. for C++ code like the following:

<SNIP>

> Ping? Any chance that I could get a review on this one please? It works really 
> well for me and greatly improves perf's usability for C++ code bases.

yeah, indeed that would be great to have someone reviewing this,

- Arnaldo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ