linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V15 06/11] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 08 May 2017 18:28:24 +0100
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
CC:     christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        lenb@...nel.org, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, robert.moore@...el.com,
        lv.zheng@...el.com, nkaje@...eaurora.org, zjzhang@...eaurora.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        eun.taik.lee@...sung.com, sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com,
        labbott@...hat.com, shijie.huang@....com, rruigrok@...eaurora.org,
        paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, tn@...ihalf.com, fu.wei@...aro.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bristot@...hat.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...ica.org, Suzuki.Poulose@....com, punit.agrawal@....com,
        astone@...hat.com, harba@...eaurora.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
        john.garry@...wei.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com, joe@...ches.com,
        bp@...en8.de, rafael@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        gengdongjiu@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 06/11] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for
 ARMv8

Hi Tyler,

On 19/04/17 00:05, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> ARM APEI extension proposal added SEA (Synchronous External Abort)
> notification type for ARMv8.
> Add a new GHES error source handling function for SEA. If an error
> source's notification type is SEA, then this function can be registered
> into the SEA exception handler. That way GHES will parse and report
> SEA exceptions when they occur.
> An SEA can interrupt code that had interrupts masked and is treated as
> an NMI. To aid this the page of address space for mapping APEI buffers
> while in_nmi() is always reserved, and ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi() is
> changed to use the helper methods to find the prot_t to map with in
> the same way as ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq().

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index b74d8b7..10013ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -518,6 +520,17 @@ static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
>  		inf->name, esr, addr);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Synchronous aborts may interrupt code which had interrupts masked.
> +	 * Before calling out into the wider kernel tell the interested
> +	 * subsystems.
> +	 */
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA)) {
> +		nmi_enter();
> +		ghes_notify_sea();
> +		nmi_exit();
> +	}
> +
>  	info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
>  	info.si_errno = 0;
>  	info.si_code  = 0;


I was tidying up the masking/unmasking in entry.S, something I wasn't aware of
that leads to a bug:
entry.S will unmask interrupts for instruction/data aborts that came from a
context with interrupts enabled. This makes sense for get_user() and friends...
For do_sea() we pull nmi_enter() as this can interrupt interrupts-masked code,
such as APEI, but if we end up in here with interrupts unmasked we can take an
IRQ from this 'NMI' context, which will inherit the in_nmi() and could lead to
the deadlock we were originally trying to avoid.

Teaching entry.S to spot external aborts is messy. I think the two choices are
to either mask interrupts when calling nmi_enter() (as these things should be
mutually exclusive), or to conditionally call nmi_enter() based on
interrupts_enabled(regs). I prefer the second one as it matches the notify_sea()
while interruptible that happens when KVM takes one of these.



Thanks,

James