[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170508173121.v45f76tyihk2x5xq@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 12:31:21 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] Input: pwm-vibra: new driver
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:28:22AM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Provide a simple driver for PWM controllable vibrators. It
> will be used by Motorola Droid 4.
>
> Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
> ---
> Changes since PATCHv1:
> - move driver removal code to input->close function
> - mark PM functions __maybe_unused and drop #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> - remove duplicate NULL check for vibrator in probe function
> - cancel work in suspend function
> Changes since PATCHv2:
> - Add Kconfig dependency on INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
> - Add Tested-by from Tiny Lindgren
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt | 60 ++++
> drivers/input/misc/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/input/misc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/input/misc/pwm-vibra.c | 343 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 416 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/input/misc/pwm-vibra.c
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c35be4691366
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
> +* PWM vibrator device tree bindings
> +
> +Registers a PWM device as vibrator.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should be
> + * "pwm-vibrator"
> + For vibrators controlled using the PWM channel's duty cycle (higher duty means
> + the vibrator becomes stronger).
> + * "motorola,mapphone-pwm-vibrator"
> + For vibrator found in Motorola Droid 4. This vibrator generates a pulse for
> + every rising edge, so its controlled using a duty cycle of 50% and changing
s/its/it's/
> + the period time.
What does "controlled" mean? strength? Shorter period is stronger?
> +- pwm-names: Should contain "enable" and optionally "direction"
What does direction mean? Does that apply to both compatibles.
> +- pwms: Should contain a PWM handle for each entry in pwm-names
> +
> +Example from Motorola Droid 4:
> +
> +&omap4_pmx_core {
> + vibrator_direction_pin: pinmux_vibrator_direction_pin {
> + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> + OMAP4_IOPAD(0x1ce, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE1) /* dmtimer8_pwm_evt (gpio_27) */
> + >;
> + };
> +
> + vibrator_enable_pin: pinmux_vibrator_enable_pin {
> + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> + OMAP4_IOPAD(0X1d0, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE1) /* dmtimer9_pwm_evt (gpio_28) */
> + >;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +/ {
> + pwm8: dmtimer-pwm {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&vibrator_direction_pin>;
> +
> + compatible = "ti,omap-dmtimer-pwm";
> + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> + ti,timers = <&timer8>;
> + ti,clock-source = <0x01>;
> + };
> +
> + pwm9: dmtimer-pwm {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&vibrator_enable_pin>;
> +
> + compatible = "ti,omap-dmtimer-pwm";
> + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> + ti,timers = <&timer9>;
> + ti,clock-source = <0x01>;
> + };
> +
> + vibrator {
> + compatible = "pwm-vibrator";
> + pwms = <&pwm8 0 1000000000 0>,
> + <&pwm9 0 1000000000 0>;
> + pwm-names = "enable", "direction";
> + };
> +};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists