[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170508.172618.676839687841750049.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 17:26:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: karim.eshapa@...il.com
Cc: inaky.perez-gonzalez@...el.com, linux-wimax@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: wimax: i2400m: i2400m-usb: Use
time_after for time comparison
From: Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 18:58:02 +0200
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/i2400m-usb.h b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/i2400m-usb.h
> index 649ecad..6fc941c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/i2400m-usb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/i2400m-usb.h
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static inline int edc_inc(struct edc *edc, u16 max_err, u16 timeframe)
> unsigned long now;
>
> now = jiffies;
> - if (now - edc->timestart > timeframe) {
> + if (time_after(now - edc->timestart, (unsigned long)timeframe)) {
This is far from correct.
time_after() compares two "jiffies" timestamp values. The second
argument here is not a jiffies timestamp value.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists