[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170509072720.xq6pwuxe43wjbgox@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 10:27:20 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, gary.bisson@...ndarydevices.com,
vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com, tony@...mide.com,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx: Check for memory allocation failure
On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 04:40:38AM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 10:23:59AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > If 'devm_kzalloc' fails, a NULL pointer will be dereferenced.
> > Return -ENOMEM instead, as done for the other memory allocation just a
> > few lines below.
>
> This looks fine.
>
> > BTW, change the 'devm_kzalloc' into a 'devm_kcalloc'.
>
> Any reason for the devm_kcalloc change? It looks like the next for loop
> does set all of the group_name values.
>
The advantage of kcalloc() over kzalloc() is the integer overflow
checking. There is kmalloc_array() if we don't need to zero the memory.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists