[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14829.1494317484@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 09:11:24 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] key: Convert big_key payload.data to struct
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> This doesn't protect you against changes in struct path size,
> though... the existing code (and this proposal) will break if that
> ever happens...
True - in which case you should kmalloc() it as Eric suggests.
> What's the problem with defining the types at the top level? That
> seems like a nice place to see them all at once.
It means adding a bunch of dependencies to linux/key.h and union key_payload.
Have you considered why we don't just put all the definitions for all the
filesystems in linux/fs.h? By this logic it would seem like a nice place to
see them all at once.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists