lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14829.1494317484@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 09 May 2017 09:11:24 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] key: Convert big_key payload.data to struct

Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

> This doesn't protect you against changes in struct path size,
> though... the existing code (and this proposal) will break if that
> ever happens...

True - in which case you should kmalloc() it as Eric suggests.

> What's the problem with defining the types at the top level? That
> seems like a nice place to see them all at once.

It means adding a bunch of dependencies to linux/key.h and union key_payload.

Have you considered why we don't just put all the definitions for all the
filesystems in linux/fs.h?  By this logic it would seem like a nice place to
see them all at once.

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ