linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ath: ath9k: remove unnecessary code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 09 May 2017 07:01:58 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>
Cc:     ath9k-devel <ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ath: ath9k: remove unnecessary code

Hi Kalle,

Quoting Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>:

> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com> writes:
>
>> The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
>> So this test will always evaluate as true.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364903
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c  
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>> index fb80ec8..5c3bc28 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ bool ath9k_hw_nvram_read(struct ath_hw *ah, u32  
>> off, u16 *data)
>>
>>  	if (ah->eeprom_blob)
>>  		ret = ath9k_hw_nvram_read_firmware(ah->eeprom_blob, off, data);
>> -	else if (pdata && !pdata->use_eeprom && pdata->eeprom_data)
>> +	else if (pdata && !pdata->use_eeprom)
>>  		ret = ath9k_hw_nvram_read_pdata(pdata, off, data);
>>  	else
>>  		ret = common->bus_ops->eeprom_read(common, off, data);
>
> The patch may very well be valid (didn't check yet) but the commit log
> is gibberish for me.
>

Let me correct that and I'll send the patch again.

Thanks!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva