[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170509140414.ycw4z6zsdevbkozm@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 17:04:14 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Ari Kauppi <ari@...opsys.com>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: avoid out of bounds read on array nfsd4_layout_ops
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 02:31:21PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> index 1dbf62190bee..c453a1998e00 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -1259,7 +1259,8 @@ nfsd4_layout_verify(struct svc_export *exp, unsigned int layout_type)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - if (layout_type >= 32 || !(exp->ex_layout_types & (1 << layout_type))) {
> + if (layout_type >= LAYOUT_TYPE_MAX ||
> + !(exp->ex_layout_types & (1 << layout_type))) {
The 32 is there to prevent a shift wrapping bug. The bit test prevents
a buffer overflow so this can't actually overflow. But this change
doesn't hurt and is probably cleaner.
exp->ex_layout_types is set in nfsd4_setup_layout_type().
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists