[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175723f4-a66e-5059-c47e-19def1bf847b@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 20:57:55 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/86] 3.12.74-stable review
On 05/04/2017, 05:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:04:16AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.74 release.
>> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Mon May 8 11:03:52 CEST 2017.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
> Build results:
> total: 125 pass: 125 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 93 pass: 93 fail: 0
>
> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.
On 05/04/2017, 08:57 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Thank you both for all the test during all the releases. Hopefully this
was the last 3.12, so I won't bother you more with this line.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists