[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc0rXwYKega9nJMrMe0tua6hrM7GTKOOJNsTNYR7KfGOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 22:26:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
"dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:16 PM, <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com> wrote:
>> > 46 4f 4d 42 54 15 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00
>> > That's now FOMBT
>>
>> I think you just mistakenly take 0x54 as letter when it looks more like
>>
>> 0x00001554
This one looks like offset (or size 5460)
>> 0x00000001
>> 0x00000001
>>
>> from the above dump.
> Ah, that's true, but second word is different than original was main point.
> We didn't know what that represented (maybe it's part of magic header).
>
> 46 4f 4d 42 01 00 00 00 ed 04 00 00 d8 15 00 00
> 0x00000001
0x000015d8
Again, looks like offset (or size).
0x000004ed
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists