[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrV5ogB0qx4Mp0yYBSDvOPOCnKT-NjVa-0TwFurC2XSKpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 15:54:03 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB to track the actual loaded mm
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> /* context.lock is held for us, so we don't need any locking. */
>> static void flush_ldt(void *current_mm)
>> {
>> + struct mm_struct *mm = current_mm;
>> mm_context_t *pc;
>>
>> - if (current->active_mm != current_mm)
>> + if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) != current_mm)
>
> While functional correct, this really should compare against 'mm'.
>
Fixed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists