linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Enable multiple calls to security_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJoNmLMeXzRbbgefGUN_t-44K-55Sr24QFpuBjg6BE0iw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2017 16:35:01 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Enable multiple calls to security_add_hooks() for
 the same LSM

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
> The commit d69dece5f5b6 ("LSM: Add /sys/kernel/security/lsm") extend
> security_add_hooks() with a new parameter to register the LSM name,
> which may be useful to make the list of currently loaded LSM available
> to userspace. However, there is no clean way for an LSM to split its
> hook declarations into multiple files, which may reduce the mess with
> all the included files (needed for LSM hook argument types) and make the
> source code easier to review and maintain.
>
> This change allows an LSM to register multiple times its hook while
> keeping a consistent list of LSM names as described in
> Documentation/security/LSM.txt . The list reflects the order in which
> checks are made. This patch only check for the last registered LSM. If
> an LSM register multiple times its hooks, interleaved with other LSM
> registrations (which should not happen), its name will still appear in
> the same order that the hooks are called, hence multiple times.
>
> To sum up, "capability,selinux,foo,foo" will be replaced with
> "capability,selinux,foo", however "capability,foo,selinux,foo" will
> remain as is.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
> Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
> Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ccad825b-7a58-e499-e51b-bd7c98581afe@schaufler-ca.com
> ---
>  security/security.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 549bddcc2116..6be65050b268 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mount.h>
>  #include <linux/personality.h>
>  #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <net/flow.h>
>
>  #define MAX_LSM_EVM_XATTR      2
> @@ -86,6 +87,32 @@ static int __init choose_lsm(char *str)
>  }
>  __setup("security=", choose_lsm);
>
> +static bool match_last_lsm(const char *list, const char *last)
> +{
> +       size_t list_len, last_len, i;
> +
> +       if (!list || !last)
> +               return false;
> +       list_len = strlen(list);
> +       last_len = strlen(last);
> +       if (!last_len || !list_len)
> +               return false;
> +       if (last_len > list_len)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < last_len; i++) {
> +               if (list[list_len - 1 - i] != last[last_len - 1 - i])
> +                       return false;
> +       }
> +       /* Check if last_len == list_len */
> +       if (i == list_len)
> +               return true;
> +       /* Check if it is a full name */
> +       if (list[list_len - 1 - i] == ',')
> +               return true;
> +       return false;
> +}

This could be reduced to just:

static bool match_last_lsm(const char *list, const char *lsm)
{
    char *last;

    last = strrchr(list, ',') ?: list;

    return (strcmp(last, lsm) == 0);
}

> +
>  static int lsm_append(char *new, char **result)
>  {
>         char *cp;
> @@ -93,6 +120,9 @@ static int lsm_append(char *new, char **result)
>         if (*result == NULL) {
>                 *result = kstrdup(new, GFP_KERNEL);
>         } else {
> +               /* Check if it is the last registered name */
> +               if (match_last_lsm(*result, new))
> +                       return 0;
>                 cp = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s,%s", *result, new);
>                 if (cp == NULL)
>                         return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.11.0
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security