linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: fix spelling mistake: "allocationf" -> "allocation"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 May 2017 18:06:26 +0800 (SGT)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: fix spelling mistake: "allocationf"
 -> "allocation"



On Wed, 10 May 2017, Colin King wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in dev_err message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c
> index 21cac1c8dd4c..e74119113713 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static int sst_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
>  			snd_dma_continuous_data(GFP_DMA),
>  			SST_MIN_BUFFER, SST_MAX_BUFFER);
>  		if (retval) {
> -			dev_err(rtd->dev, "dma buffer allocationf fail\n");
> +			dev_err(rtd->dev, "dma buffer allocation fail\n");

Maybe fail -> failure would be nice too?  If the message is useful at all.

julia

>  			return retval;
>  		}
>  	}
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>