linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] platform/x86: thinkpad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1494413508.30052.100.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 May 2017 13:51:48 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc:     Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <ibm-acpi@....eng.br>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Join string
 literals back

On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 21:24 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, May 9, 2017, at 14:33, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 14:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> > wrote:
> > > > While here, print negative error without changing a sign as it
> > > > is a
> > > > common pattern in the kernel.
> > > 
> > > A separate patch for this would be better: it would be easier to
> > > actually check that no functional changes crept in by mistake.
> > 
> > It doesn't make sense to me. It would touch same lines of code I do
> > already here and it's only one place, see below.
> 
> I had to go line-by-line looking for the darn thing, instead of just
> compiling before-and-after and checking for an unchanged  object file.
> 
> > > >  	rc = fan_set_enable();
> > > >  	if (rc < 0) {
> > > > -		pr_err("fan watchdog: error %d while enabling
> > > > fan,
> > > > "
> > > > -		       "will try again later...\n", -rc);
> > > > +		pr_err("fan watchdog: error %d while enabling
> > > > fan,
> > > > will try again later...\n",
> > > > +		       rc);
> 
> Yeah. This one.  I don't have a problem with this change at all (I
> acked
> it), but it took some effort to find the nail in the hailstack.

Okay, what I'm going to do is:
1) drop patch 1 for now;
2) split patch 2 into two patches (and append your Ack on both);
3) push to our testing branch (I can send v2 if we need one more round
of review).

Tell me if there is any objection.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy