[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170510115511.GB15307@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 12:55:12 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
zijun_hu <zijun_hu@....com>, angus@...usclark.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: Silence first allocation with
CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS=y
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 09:38:03AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:07:24AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:07:28PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > On 05/03/2017 04:18 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > >> When CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, the first allocation using the
> > > >> module space fails, because the module is too big, and then the module
> > > >> allocation is attempted from vmalloc space. Silence the first allocation
> > > >> failure in that case by setting __GFP_NOWARN.
> > > >>
> > > >> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> > > >> ---
> > > >> arch/arm64/kernel/module.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure what the merge plan is for these, but the arm64 bit here
> > > > looks fine to me:
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > >
> > > Thanks, not sure either, would you or Catalin want to pick this series?
> >
> > We'd need an Ack from Russell on the arch/arm/ part before we could take
> > this series.
>
> The first patch touches mm/vmalloc.c, so we could also merge the series
> via akpm's tree. Andrew, do you have any preference?
Michal Hocko acked that one, so I think we can take the whole series via
arm64.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists