linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm/arm64: signal SIBGUS and inject SEA Error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10cdbd75-2b89-c816-e688-91f111687819@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 May 2017 20:37:59 +0800
From:   gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
To:     Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
CC:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        gengdongjiu <gengdj.1984@...il.com>,
        Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
        <rjw@...ysocki.net>, "Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        <lv.zheng@...el.com>, <nkaje@...eaurora.org>,
        <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <eun.taik.lee@...sung.com>,
        Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
        <labbott@...hat.com>, <shijie.huang@....com>,
        <rruigrok@...eaurora.org>, <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        <tn@...ihalf.com>, Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>,
        <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <bristot@...hat.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <devel@...ica.org>,
        <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>, Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>,
        <astone@...hat.com>, <harba@...eaurora.org>,
        "Hanjun Guo" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>, <joe@...ches.com>,
        Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm/arm64: signal SIBGUS and inject SEA Error

Hi Christoffer,

On 2017/5/10 20:20, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 05:15:04PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> Thanks James's explanation.
>>
>> Hi Christoffer,
>>
>> On 2017/5/9 22:28, James Morse wrote:
>>> Hi Christoffer,
>>>
>>> On 08/05/17 18:54, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:28:02PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
>>>> I must admit I am losing track of exactly what this proposed API was
>>>> supposed to do.
>>>
>>> There are two, and we keep jumping between them!
>>> This is about two notification methods APEI has for arm64, 'SEA' and 'SEI'.
>>>
>>> SEA is synchronous and looks like a data abort. Qemu/kvmtool can inject these
>>> today using the KVM_GET/SET_ONE_REG API whenever it wants to.
>>>
>>> SEI uses SError, is asynchronous and can be masked. In addition these need to be
>>> consumed/synchronised by the ESB instruction, even when executed by a guest.
>>> Hardware has the necessary bits to drive all this, we need to expose an API to
>>> drive it.
>>>
>>> (I try to spell them out each time so I don't confuse SEI with something
>>> synchronous!)
>>>
>>>
>>> This patch was about SEA. I think you've answered our question:
>>
>> we are talking about the SEA(synchronous data abort) injection two methods:
>>
>> (1)change vcpu registers in the Qemu/kvmtools and using the KVM_GET/SET_ONE_REG API to set.
> 
> Yes, if this is possible, why would you want something more?
  we will use this method.

> 
>> (2)using existed in-kernel API "kvm_inject_dabt" to inject through IOCTL command from Qemu.
>>
> 
> I'm not really going to consider this, because "use internal API from
> userspace" doesn't work.
> 
> So this should be:
> 
>   (2) Introduce a new API to do X.
  you can ignore the second method, now we will not use it.

> 
> I still think you know what my preference is; use the existing API if at
> all possible.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Christoffer
> 
> .
>