linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Zero out positive runtime after throttling constrained tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 May 2017 09:36:33 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Zero out positive runtime after
 throttling constrained tasks

On Wed, 10 May 2017 21:03:37 +0800
Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com> wrote:

> When a contrained task is throttled by dl_check_constrained_dl(),
> it may carry the remaining positive runtime, as a result when
> dl_task_timer() fires and calls replenish_dl_entity(), it will
> not be replenished correctly due to the positive dl_se->runtime.
> 
> This patch assigns its runtime to 0 if positive after throttling.
> 
> Fixes: df8eac8cafce ("sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline)
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index a2ce590..d3d291e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -723,6 +723,8 @@ static inline void dl_check_constrained_dl(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
>  		if (unlikely(dl_se->dl_boosted || !start_dl_timer(p)))
>  			return;
>  		dl_se->dl_throttled = 1;
> +		if (dl_se->runtime > 0)
> +			dl_se->runtime = 0;

This makes sense to me, but should we have any accounting for runtime
that was missed due to wakeups and such?

-- Steve

>  	}
>  }
>