lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxfBG5tc3ysXF_A_5mvsYk4Y2zdq+OD_oxoaDz0UrXMKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 May 2017 11:55:21 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] TEE driver infrastructure and OP-TEE drivers

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> TEE driver infrastructure and OP-TEE drivers

Another note: right now this adds a config question for TEE support,
but the only actual TEE driver has a

        depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC

on it.

Until we get more TEE drivers, might I suggest that we perhaps make
the TEE config option have

        depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC || COMPILE_TEST

so that the generic tee code still gets the compile test coverage, but
we don't confuse people by asking about infrastructure that they can't
possibly use..

Hmm?

                Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ