[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170511082948.wfzuh5coviinyul3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 10:29:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drbd: fix request leak introduced by locking/atomic,
kref: Kill kref_sub()
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:21:46AM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> Regression fix for 4.11, which totally broke DRBD
>
> When killing kref_sub(), the unconditional additional kref_get()
> was not properly paired with the necessary kref_put(), causing
> a leak of struct drbd_requests (~ 224 Bytes) per submitted bio,
> and breaking DRBD in general, as the destructor of those "drbd_requests"
> does more than just the mempoll_free().
>
> Fixes: bdfafc4ffdd2 ("locking/atomic, kref: Kill kref_sub()")
> Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
Dang, sorry about that. Thanks for fixing it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists