[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+ZRaWbMxDBvZ36qnjECTGpc19oK_ZoEZJ3gkoQSw=VFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 10:13:18 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: remove extraneous 'const' in typedef
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>> One change that was meant to address a sparse warning turned out
>>> to cause hundreds of new gcc-7 warnings:
>>
>> I guess you are the only one on gcc-7.
>
> It was just released last week or so. I actually had been using it for
> a while but accidentally disabled a lot of the warning output until now
> some others started using it too and asked me about it.
>
>>> include/linux/of_irq.h:11:13: error: type qualifiers ignored on function return type [-Werror=ignored-qualifiers]
>>>
>>> After reverting the change, the gcc warnings are gone again, and I
>>> can't reproduce the sparse warnings either.
>>
>> Humm, maybe different sparse versions? I'm on 0.5.0.
>
> I have v0.5.0-183-gfbbfc73. To clarify, I did not get a sparse warning after my
> patch, I did not try reverting your patch first.
Indeed, the warnings are gone with current sparse from git.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists