[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <2438676.F6TUoaB08n@amdc3058>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 17:22:54 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] omapfb: Use devm_kcalloc() in vrfb_probe()
On Thursday, May 11, 2017 04:27:19 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > @@ -358,11 +358,7 @@ static int __init vrfb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return PTR_ERR(vrfb_base);
> >
> > num_ctxs = pdev->num_resources - 1;
> > -
> > - ctxs = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> > - sizeof(struct vrfb_ctx) * num_ctxs,
> > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > -
> > + ctxs = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_ctxs, sizeof(*ctxs), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> This change makes the resulting binary larger by 24 bytes (probably
> because of the need to have an additional function argument) and
24 bytes seemed too much for just an additional function argument
so I've checked the source:
static inline void *devm_kzalloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
{
return devm_kmalloc(dev, size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
}
static inline void *devm_kmalloc_array(struct device *dev,
size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
{
if (size != 0 && n > SIZE_MAX / size)
return NULL;
return devm_kmalloc(dev, n * size, flags);
}
static inline void *devm_kcalloc(struct device *dev,
size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
{
return devm_kmalloc_array(dev, n, size, flags | __GFP_ZERO);
}
The extra kcalloc() checks are inlined currently into each instance.
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists