linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] FS: Fixing return type of unsigned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMvNc9AsahXxFsYo91VoW-YLLk9=BFE9j1BK-Bkm_ZQrvsS67w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 May 2017 10:13:23 +0530
From:   Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar.iit@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FS: Fixing return type of unsigned_offsets

Should I change my implementation, i.e. remove '!!'?

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 09:57 +0530, Pushkar Jambhlekar wrote:
>> Fixing Sparse warning. It should return bool, instead it returns
>> int.
> []
>> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> []
>> @@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ const struct file_operations generic_ro_fops = {
>>
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_ro_fops);
>>
>> -static inline int unsigned_offsets(struct file *file)
>> +static inline bool unsigned_offsets(struct file *file)
>>  {
>> -     return file->f_mode & FMODE_UNSIGNED_OFFSET;
>> +     return !!(file->f_mode & FMODE_UNSIGNED_OFFSET);
>
> trivia: the !! isn't necessary as by definition
> all non-zero assigns to bool are converted to 1.
>



-- 
Jambhlekar Pushkar Arun