linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: when claiming hog, skip maps not served by same device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170511214444.GB3489@atomide.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 May 2017 14:44:45 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chris Healy <Chris.Healy@....aero>, Jeff.White@....aero
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: when claiming hog, skip maps not served by same
 device

* Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com> [170511 13:05]:
> When pinctrl device registers, it automatically claims hogs, that is,
> maps that pinctrl device serves for itself.
> 
> It is possible that in addition to SoC's pinctrl device, other pinctrl
> devices get registered. E.g. some gpio expander devies are registered
> as pinctrl devices. For such devices, pinctrl maps could be defined
> that set up SoC's pins (e.g. interrupt pin for gpio expander). Such
> a map will have target device set to gpio expander.
> 
> Here is device tree snippet that causes this scenario:
> 
> &i2c0 {
> 	sx1503@20 {
> 		compatible = "semtech,sx1503q";
> 		pinctrl-names = "default";
> 		pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sx1503_20>;
> 		...
> 	};
> };
> ...
> &iomuxc {
> 	pinctrl_sx1503_20: pinctrl-sx1503-20 {
> 		fsl,pins = <
> 			VF610_PAD_PTB1__GPIO_23         0x219d
> 		>;
> 	};
> };
> 
> Such a map will have target device set to gpio expander. However is not
> a hog, it is a regular map that is claimed by core before gpio expander
> device is probed.
> 
> Thus when looking for hogs, it is not enough to check that map's target
> device is set to pinctrl device being registered. Need also check that
> map's control device is also set to the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> index 1653cbda6a82..682ebd360030 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> @@ -1038,6 +1038,16 @@ static struct pinctrl *create_pinctrl(struct device *dev,
>  		/* Map must be for this device */
>  		if (strcmp(map->dev_name, devname))
>  			continue;
> +		/*
> +		 * If pctldev is not null, we are claiming hog for it,
> +		 * that means, setting that is served by pctldev by itself.
> +		 *
> +		 * Thus we must skip map that is for this device but is served
> +		 * by other device.
> +		 */
> +		if (pctldev &&
> +		    strcmp(dev_name(pctldev->dev), map->ctrl_dev_name))
> +			continue;
>  
>  		ret = add_setting(p, pctldev, map);
>  		/*
> -- 

Maybe add a comment saying pctldev is NULL in the regular case
and only exists in the hog case?

Other than that:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>