[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170512062032.GB5866@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 08:20:32 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/103] 4.9.28-stable review
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 02:09:07PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 04:11:29PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.28 release.
> > There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat May 13 14:11:46 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.28-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
>
> Unfortunately, neither 4.9.y-rc nor 4.10.y-rc nor 4.11.y-rc is available
> in the git repo. Only 3.18.y and 4.4.y made it there.
Ah, I tried to release these as the kernel.org backend rework was
happening at the same time.
I've now regenerated all of the -rc git trees, and the tarballs, and
pushed them all to kernel.org. Hopefully all should be good now, sorry
for the problems.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists