[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170512070012.7dysuhbkcas7ibaj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 09:00:12 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] syscalls: Verify address
limit before returning to user-mode
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 08:45:22AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> We only have ~115 code blocks in the kernel that set/restore KERNEL_DS, it would
> >> be a pity to add a runtime check to every system call ...
> >
> > I think we should simply strive to remove all of them that aren't
> > in core scheduler / arch code. Basically evetyytime we do the
> >
> > oldfs = get_fs();
> > set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> > ..
> > set_fs(oldfs);
> >
> > trick we're doing something wrong, and there should always be better
> > ways to archive it. E.g. using iov_iter with a ITER_KVEC type
> > consistently would already remove most of them.
>
> How about trying to remove all of them? If we could actually get rid
> of all of them, we could drop the arch support, and we'd get faster,
> simpler, shorter uaccess code throughout the kernel.
I'm all for that!
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists