linux-kernel - Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 May 2017 09:43:22 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
cc:     Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits?

On Fri, 12 May 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>   Fixes: BKrev: 3e8e57a1JvR25MkFRNzoz85l2Gzccg ("[PATCH] linux-2.5.66-signal-cleanup.patch")
> 
> In your tree that is c3c107051660 ("[PATCH] linux-2.5.66-signal-cleanup.patch"),
> but you don't have the 3e8e57a1JvR25MkFRNzoz85l2Gzccg revision recorded
> anywhere that I can see.

That's correct. I did not include the BK revisions when I imported the
commits into the history git. I did not see any reason to do so. I still
have no idea what the value would have been or why anyone wants to
reference them at all.

Thanks,

	tglx