[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170512140319.GD3489@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 07:03:19 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Healy <Chris.Healy@....aero>, Jeff.White@....aero
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: when claiming hog, skip maps not served by same
device
* Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com> [170512 01:22]:
> >> + /*
> >> + * If pctldev is not null, we are claiming hog for it,
> >> + * that means, setting that is served by pctldev by itself.
> >> + *
> >> + * Thus we must skip map that is for this device but is served
> >> + * by other device.
> >> + */
> >> + if (pctldev &&
> >> + strcmp(dev_name(pctldev->dev), map->ctrl_dev_name))
> >> + continue;
> >>
> >> ret = add_setting(p, pctldev, map);
> >> /*
> >> --
> >
> > Maybe add a comment saying pctldev is NULL in the regular case
> > and only exists in the hog case?
>
> Isn't comment above saying exactly that?
Yes it is, you're right :)
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists