[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170512135752.1800-5-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 16:57:47 +0300
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: <b-liu@...com>, <tony@...mide.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC: <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<balbi@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/9] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Use one musb_ep_select call in tusb_omap_dma_program
Having one musb_ep_select() instead the two calls in if/else is the same
thing, but makes the code a bit simpler to follow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
---
drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
index 7870b37e0ea5..025b52e0b34d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
@@ -368,15 +368,14 @@ static int tusb_omap_dma_program(struct dma_channel *channel, u16 packet_sz,
/*
* Prepare MUSB for DMA transfer
*/
+ musb_ep_select(mbase, chdat->epnum);
if (chdat->tx) {
- musb_ep_select(mbase, chdat->epnum);
csr = musb_readw(hw_ep->regs, MUSB_TXCSR);
csr |= (MUSB_TXCSR_AUTOSET | MUSB_TXCSR_DMAENAB
| MUSB_TXCSR_DMAMODE | MUSB_TXCSR_MODE);
csr &= ~MUSB_TXCSR_P_UNDERRUN;
musb_writew(hw_ep->regs, MUSB_TXCSR, csr);
} else {
- musb_ep_select(mbase, chdat->epnum);
csr = musb_readw(hw_ep->regs, MUSB_RXCSR);
csr |= MUSB_RXCSR_DMAENAB;
csr &= ~(MUSB_RXCSR_AUTOCLEAR | MUSB_RXCSR_DMAMODE);
--
2.13.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists