[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1494555237.118905.54.camel@ranerica-desktop>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 19:13:57 -0700
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
Alexandre Julliard <julliard@...ehq.org>,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-msdos@...r.kernel.org, wine-devel@...ehq.org,
Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 07/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get
segment descriptor
On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 13:02 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 02:51:56PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > > > + seg >= current->active_mm->context.ldt->size)) {
> > >
> > > ldt->size is the size of the descriptor table but you've shifted seg by
> > > 3. That selector index is shifted by 3 (to the left) to form an offset
> > > into the descriptor table because the entries there are 8 bytes.
> >
> > I double-checked the ldt code and it seems to me that size refers to the
> > number of entries in the table; it is always multiplied by
> > LDT_ENTRY_SIZE [1], [2]. Am I missing something?
>
> No, you're not. I fell into that wrongly named struct member trap.
>
> So ldt_struct.size should actually be called ldt_struct.n_entries or
> similar. Because what's in there is now is not "size".
>
> And then code like
>
> new_ldt->size * LDT_ENTRY_SIZE
>
> would make much more sense if written like this:
>
> new_ldt->n_entries * LDT_ENTRY_SIZE
>
> Would you fix that in a prepatch pls?
>
Sure I can. Would this trigger a v8 of my series? I was hoping v7 series
could be merged and then start doing incremental work on top of it. Does
it make sense?
Thanks and BR,
Ricardo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists