[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <149460544264.18650.5677597682925453388.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 19:11:31 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: <mhocko@...e.com>, <avagin@...nvz.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<oleg@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
<luto@...nel.org>, <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
<ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>, <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] pid_ns: Fix race between setns'ed fork() and
zap_pid_ns_processes()
Imagine we have a pid namespace and a task from its parent's pid_ns,
which made setns() to the pid namespace. The task is doing fork(),
while the pid namespace's child reaper is dying. We have the race
between them:
Task from parent pid_ns Child reaper
copy_process() ..
alloc_pid() ..
.. zap_pid_ns_processes()
.. disable_pid_allocation()
.. read_lock(&tasklist_lock)
.. iterate over pids in pid_ns
.. kill tasks linked to pids
.. read_unlock(&tasklist_lock)
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); ..
attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID); ..
.. ..
So, just created task p won't receive SIGKILL signal,
and the pid namespace will be in contradictory state.
Only manual kill will help there, but does the userspace
care about this? I suppose, the most users just inject
a task into a pid namespace and wait a SIGCHLD from it.
The patch fixes the problem. It simply checks for
(pid_ns->nr_hashed & PIDNS_HASH_ADDING) in copy_process().
We do it under the tasklist_lock, and can't skip
PIDNS_HASH_ADDING as noted by Oleg:
"zap_pid_ns_processes() does disable_pid_allocation()
and then takes tasklist_lock to kill the whole namespace.
Given that copy_process() checks PIDNS_HASH_ADDING
under write_lock(tasklist) they can't race;
if copy_process() takes this lock first, the new child will
be killed, otherwise copy_process() can't miss
the change in ->nr_hashed."
If allocation is disabled, we just return -ENOMEM
like it's made for such cases in alloc_pid().
v2: Do not move disable_pid_allocation(), do not
introduce a new variable in copy_process() and simplify
the patch as suggested by Oleg Nesterov.
Account the problem with double irq enabling
found by Eric W. Biederman.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
CC: Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
---
kernel/fork.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index bfd91b180778..d2cade9b6ad8 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1845,11 +1845,13 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
*/
recalc_sigpending();
if (signal_pending(current)) {
- spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
- write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
retval = -ERESTARTNOINTR;
goto bad_fork_cancel_cgroup;
}
+ if (unlikely(!(ns_of_pid(pid)->nr_hashed & PIDNS_HASH_ADDING))) {
+ retval = -ENOMEM;
+ goto bad_fork_cancel_cgroup;
+ }
if (likely(p->pid)) {
ptrace_init_task(p, (clone_flags & CLONE_PTRACE) || trace);
@@ -1907,6 +1909,8 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
return p;
bad_fork_cancel_cgroup:
+ spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
+ write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
cgroup_cancel_fork(p);
bad_fork_free_pid:
cgroup_threadgroup_change_end(current);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists