lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 May 2017 11:01:37 -0600
From:   Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Austin Christ <austinwc@...eaurora.org>,
        Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path

If load_balance() fails to migrate any tasks because all tasks were
affined, load_balance() removes the source cpu from consideration and
attempts to redo and balance among the new subset of cpus.

There is a bug in this code path where the algorithm considers all active
cpus in the system (minus the source that was just masked out).  This is
not valid for two reasons: some active cpus may not be in the current
scheduling domain and one of the active cpus is dst_cpu. These cpus should
not be considered, as we cannot pull load from them.

Instead of failing out of load_balance(), we may end up redoing the search
with no valid cpus and incorrectly concluding the domain is balanced.
Additionally, if the group_imbalance flag was just set, it may also be
incorrectly unset, thus the flag will not be seen by other cpus in future
load_balance() runs as that algorithm intends.

Fix the check by removing cpus not in the current domain and the dst_cpu
from considertation, thus limiting the evaluation to valid remaining cpus
from which load might be migrated.

Signed-off-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d711093..8f783ba 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8219,8 +8219,19 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 
 		/* All tasks on this runqueue were pinned by CPU affinity */
 		if (unlikely(env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED)) {
+			struct cpumask tmp;
+
+			/* Cpumask of all initially possible busiest cpus. */
+			cpumask_copy(&tmp, sched_domain_span(env.sd));
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(env.dst_cpu, &tmp);
+
 			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_of(busiest), cpus);
-			if (!cpumask_empty(cpus)) {
+			/*
+			 * Go back to "redo" iff the load-balance cpumask
+			 * contains other potential busiest cpus for the
+			 * current sched domain.
+			 */
+			if (cpumask_intersects(cpus, &tmp)) {
 				env.loop = 0;
 				env.loop_break = sched_nr_migrate_break;
 				goto redo;
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists