lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 May 2017 12:40:26 -0500
From:   Bin Liu <>
To:     Tony Lindgren <>
CC:     Moreno Bartalucci <>,
        Lars Melin <>,
        "" <>,
        "" <>,
        "" <>,
        Alessio Igor Bogani <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-musb: keep VBUS on when device is disconnected

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:21:35AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Bin Liu <> [170512 08:24]:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 07:58:49AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > OK. No better ideas except I think we should probably have a separate
> > > timer for keeping VBUS on after state changes eventually.
> > 
> > Currently with the patch below, VBUS is constantly on for host-only
> > mode, and this is what we want. Why we need a separate timer? No one
> > cuts VBUs now for host-only mode.
> Oh I was just thinking what we might want to do in the future if
> we want to cut off VBUS when no devices are connected. If we have

Okay, I see. But I don't think we will ever want to turn off VBUS when
no devices attached for host-only mode. Any other controllers do this?

Turning off VBUS doesn't save us much, because it comes from an external
power rail, and no one consumes it when no devices are attached.

I believe keeping the controller idle as what we have now is sufficient.


> a USB modem for example it might first enumerate as some boot device,
> then nothing for 20 seconds while it's booting, and then we have a
> different device enumerating after the modem has booted. During this
> period we want to keep VBUS on and will go through multiple
> OTG_STATE_A_WAIT_BCON states. So we can't really control VBUS using
> Regards,
> Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists