linux-kernel - Re: [Resend][PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Document the current behavior and user interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3181654.xFf7BefZXq@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Fri, 12 May 2017 23:42:29 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Resend][PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Document the current behavior and user interface

On Friday, May 12, 2017 03:20:48 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri, 12 May 2017 22:47:25 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> 
> > > Hi Jon,
> > > 
> > > All of the dependencies for this patch have been merged, so I can route it
> > > through the PM tree.
> > > 
> > > Please let me know if you prefer to take it into the documentation tree instead.  
> > 
> > I'm taking the lack of response as the lack of objections, so I'll route this
> > document through the PM tree.
> 
> Sorry, didn't mean to drop the ball on this.

No worries.

> Anyway, no objections.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Rafael