[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4926dfa-5a48-11f5-024f-73bc76f1ba1e@landley.net>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 12:26:53 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits?
On 05/12/2017 12:49 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Mai 12 2017, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
>
>> Last I checked I couldn't just "git push" the fullhist tree to
>> git.kernel.org because git graft didn't propagate right.
>
> Perhaps you could recreate them with git replace --graft. That creates
> replace objects that can be pushed and fetched. (They are stored in
> refs/replace, and must be pushed/fetched explicitly.)
It's the "must be pushed/fetched explicitly" part that I couldn't figure
out back when I tried it.
I inherited this tree from somebody who made it. I noticed its existence
because lwn.net covered it, and then 6 months later it had vanished
without trace (as so many things do). I reproduced it from the build
script (if you can't reproduce the experiment from initial starting
conditions, it's not science), went "look, cool thing", and hosted a
copy with an occasional repaint.
I would be _thrilled_ to hand it off to somebody who knows what they're
doing with git. I'm just unusually interested in computer history and
the preservation thereof. (https://landley.net/history/mirror).
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists