[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170513195659.GE390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 20:56:59 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] uaccess-related bits of vfs.git
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:00:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > We should probably even consider looking at __get_user/__put_user().
> > Few of them are actually performance-critical.
>
> Look at that date. It's over two years ago. In the intervening two
> years, how many of those conversions have happened?
>
> Here's a hint: it's a very very round number.
FWIW, just this cycle (this one I remembered off-hand, there might be
more):
commit edb88cef0570914375d461107759cf0d6d677ed5
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Date: Sat Apr 22 00:02:31 2017 +0200
scsi: pmcraid: use normal copy_from_user
As pointed out by Al Viro for my previous series, the driver has no need
to call access_ok() and __copy_from_user()/__copy_to_user(). Changing
it to regular copy_from_user()/copy_to_user() simplifies the code without
any real downsides, making it less error-prone at best.
This patch by itself also addresses the warning about the access_ok()
macro on MIPS, but both fixes improve the code, so ideally we apply
them both.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists