[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <350fb783-80b5-669f-7015-46c45226ed67@citrix.com>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 21:16:17 +0100
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: pgnet.dev@...il.com, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Juergen Gross <JGross@...e.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] HPET enabled in BIOS, not presented as
available_clocksource -- config, kernel code, &/or BIOS?
On 13/05/2017 21:05, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 5/13/17 12:59 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Ok. Lack of a clocksource is to be expected.
>>
>> The reason why the HPETs are unavailable is that dom0 is not a position
>> to program them; dom0 doesn't know what Xen has set up in the IDT.
>>
>> Use `xl dmesg` to get to the hypervisor dmesg log. You should see
>> mention of the HPET in there if Xen has found it.
>
> back to the error at hand ...
>
> xl dmesg | grep -i hpet
> [ 1.365876] hpet_acpi_add: no address or irqs in _CRS
> [ 1.365876] hpet_acpi_add: no address or irqs in _CRS
>
> again, only present when booting with Xen.
>
> same kernel, no Xen, no such error.
We don't have code like that in upstream Xen. No function with that
name, or a string which looks like that error message.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149464267427111&w=2 indicates that
you are using a SuSE hypervisor.
Jan/Juergen: Any ideas? This looks as if it is something local to your
patch queue.
~Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists