[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170513070313.2460f36b@vento.lan>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 07:03:13 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
"Herton R. Krzesinski" <herton@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/36] docs-rst: convert kernel-hacking to ReST
Em Fri, 12 May 2017 18:35:29 +0200
Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de> escreveu:
> Am 12.05.2017 um 15:59 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>:
>
> > Use pandoc to convert documentation to ReST by calling
> > Documentation/sphinx/tmplcvt script.
> >
> > - Manually adjusted to use ..note and ..warning
> > - Minor fixes for it to be parsed without errors
> > - Use **bold** for emphasis.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/DocBook/Makefile | 2 +-
> > Documentation/DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl | 1312 -----------------------------
> > Documentation/conf.py | 2 +
> > Documentation/index.rst | 1 +
> > Documentation/kernel-hacking/conf.py | 10 +
> > Documentation/kernel-hacking/index.rst | 794 +++++++++++++++++
> > 6 files changed, 808 insertions(+), 1313 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 Documentation/DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/kernel-hacking/conf.py
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/kernel-hacking/index.rst
> >
> >
> ....
>
> > +:c:func:`cpu_to_be32()`/:c:func:`be32_to_cpu()`/:c:func:`cpu_to_le32()`/:c:func:`le32_to_cpu()` ``include/asm/byteorder.h``
> > +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > +
>
> Hi Mauro, just my bikeshedding:
>
> what do you think, do we really need to refer functions in titles?
> As far as I know, there is no use-case where we can get any benefit
> from. So I recommend to write titles more simple, e.g.:
>
> cpu_to_be32()/be32_to_cpu()/cpu_to_le32()/le32_to_cpu() include/asm/byteorder.h
>
> .. which is long enough ;)
There are some functions there that are only mentioned at the title,
like: local_bh_disable().
IMHO, it is a good idea to add a cross-reference to those, as it
helps the reader to get further information if needed. So, except if
this would cause Sphinx to crash, I prefer to keep the references.
What I did, instead, on patch 02/36 is to move all header references
to be outside the title:
+:c:func:`cpu_to_be32()`/:c:func:`be32_to_cpu()`/:c:func:`cpu_to_le32()`/:c:func:`le32_to_cpu()`
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Defined in ``include/asm/byteorder.h``
With reduces the displayed title to something reasonable.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists