lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 14 May 2017 09:13:49 +0800 (SGT)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>
cc:     Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>, nicolas.palix@...g.fr,
        mmarek@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Coccinelle: api: Add offset_in_page.cocci



On Fri, 5 May 2017, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:

> Use of offset_in_page is preferable instead of open coding.
> This patch adds coccinelle script for suggesting the use of
> macro offset_in_page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 	- Add parenthesis around rule for patch mode to avoid
> 	  extra parenthesis in end result
> ---
>  scripts/coccinelle/api/offset_in_page.cocci | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 scripts/coccinelle/api/offset_in_page.cocci
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/offset_in_page.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/offset_in_page.cocci
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4034864
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/offset_in_page.cocci
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +/// Use offset_in_page instead of duplicating its implementation
> +///
> +// Confidence: High
> +// Copyright: (C) 2017 Vaishali Thakkar, Oracle. GPLv2.
> +// Options: --no-includes --include-headers
> +// Keywords: offset_in_page
> +
> +virtual patch
> +virtual context
> +virtual org
> +virtual report
> +
> +@...atch depends on patch@
> +expression e;
> +identifier i;
> +@@
> +- unsigned long i = (unsigned long)e & ~PAGE_MASK;
> +...
> +- i
> ++ offset_in_page(e)

This doesn't take into account the possibility that i occurs more than
once.  It should be:

- unsigned long i = (unsigned long)e & ~PAGE_MASK;
<+...
- i
+ offset_in_page(e)
...+>

> +
> +@...patch depends on patch@
> +expression e1;
> +@@
> +
> +(
> +- ((unsigned long)e1 & ~PAGE_MASK)
> ++ offset_in_page(e1)
> +|
> +- ((unsigned long)e1 % PAGE_SIZE)
> ++ offset_in_page(e1)
> +)

& ~ and % are equivalent?  I did find both definitions in the kernel, but
I didn't think about whether they do the same thing.

julia

> +
> +@...ontext depends on !patch@
> +expression e;
> +identifier i;
> +position p;
> +@@
> +
> +* unsigned long i = (unsigned long)e@p & ~PAGE_MASK;
> +...
> +* i
> +
> +@...context depends on !patch@
> +expression e1;
> +position p1;
> +@@
> +
> +(
> +* (unsigned long)e1@p1 & ~PAGE_MASK
> +|
> +* (unsigned long)e1@p1 % PAGE_SIZE
> +)
> +
> +@...ipt:python depends on org@
> +p << r_context.p;
> +@@
> +
> +coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], "WARNING opportunity for offset_in_page")
> +
> +@...ipt:python depends on org@
> +p << r1_context.p1;
> +@@
> +
> +coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], "WARNING opportunity for offset_in_page")
> +
> +@...ipt:python depends on report@
> +p << r_context.p;
> +@@
> +
> +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "WARNING opportunity for offset_in_page")
> +
> +@...ipt:python depends on report@
> +p << r1_context.p1;
> +@@
> +
> +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "WARNING opportunity for offset_in_page")
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists