linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] regulator: Shared regulators (configured by bootloader)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170514093031.5pu3x7ugvjhqn34h@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 14 May 2017 18:30:31 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Serge Broslavsky <serge.broslavsky@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] regulator: Shared regulators (configured by bootloader)

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:51:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> I am looking to solve a problem faced by some of the Qualcomm
> platforms and want your suggestions on how should we fix it. One of my
> ex-colleague tried to solve [1] this problem but that thread never
> concluded (and I don't really agree with the solution it offered).

Please engage with the feedback I offered then.  I see no point in
repeating myself here, I'm just going to provide the same feedback as
before and if I'm going to be ignored (which appears to be the case) it
doesn't seem like it's worth the effort.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)