[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170515102011.GA31131@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 12:20:11 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Matej Dujava <mdujava@...urkovo.cz>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] staging: sm750fb: reordering of macro definitions
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 12:42:36AM +0200, Matej Dujava wrote:
> This patch reorder definition of macros so all macros are in same order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matej Dujava <mdujava@...urkovo.cz>
> ---
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h
> index 6f639d7..cef7f46 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h
> @@ -81,8 +81,8 @@
> #define DPMS_OFFSET 9
> #define DPMS_MASK (3 << DPMS_OFFSET)
> #define DPMS_USAGE (DPMS_MASK << 16)
> -#define DPMS_OFF ((3 << DPMS_OFFSET) | DPMS_USAGE)
> #define DPMS_ON ((0 << DPMS_OFFSET) | DPMS_USAGE)
> +#define DPMS_OFF ((3 << DPMS_OFFSET) | DPMS_USAGE)
What "order" are you speaking of here?
I don't understand why this change is needed, sorry.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists