[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170515103118.GA10885@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 12:31:18 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>,
Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>,
speakup@...ux-speakup.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] tty: export tty_open_by_driver
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 08:52:59PM +0100, Okash Khawaja wrote:
> This applies on top of the changes already in staging-next branch which allow
> kernel access to TTY dev.
>
> Signe-doff-by: Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
>
> Index: linux-staging/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-staging.orig/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> +++ linux-staging/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> @@ -1369,7 +1369,10 @@ static struct tty_struct *tty_driver_loo
> struct tty_struct *tty;
>
> if (driver->ops->lookup)
> - tty = driver->ops->lookup(driver, file, idx);
> + if (!file)
> + tty = ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> + else
> + tty = driver->ops->lookup(driver, file, idx);
Why make this change? Shouldn't the lookup function allow a NULL file
pointer? Or is the problem that they do not?
> else
> tty = driver->ttys[idx];
>
> @@ -2001,7 +2004,7 @@ static struct tty_driver *tty_lookup_dri
> struct tty_driver *console_driver = console_device(index);
> if (console_driver) {
> driver = tty_driver_kref_get(console_driver);
> - if (driver) {
> + if (driver && filp) {
Why change this too?
Your changelog does not explain any of this, please do so.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists