lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGgoGu72RebHt5yf-2WE6Dt3jUNqMph2Uwu+VRK2akRYXo8aow@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2017 15:09:45 +0200
From:   Fawad Lateef <fawadlateef@...il.com>
To:     GuJiangfei <qiledexin@....com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org>,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question regarding RT patches for ARM

Hi,

I am talking in general about RT patches. Like downloaded 4.9.20 from
kernel.org and applied patch "4.9.20-rt16.patch".

Thanks

-- Fawad Lateef


On 15 May 2017 at 14:51, GuJiangfei <qiledexin@....com> wrote:
> Which rt patch do you mean?
>
>
> 发自网易邮箱大师
> On 05/15/2017 20:44, Fawad Lateef wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am working on custom i.MX6 quad hardware and using RT patches for
> almost latest stable kernel 4.9 and facing some weird system stall OR
> 'unhandled page fault - exceptions'.
>
> Just want to confirm that "are RT patches for ARM are stable OR they
> are still experimental?" As I heard from my other colleagues that RT
> patches are not stable for ARM and should be avoided.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> -- Fawad Lateef
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org
> https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ