lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 19:05:39 +0300 From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix inode leak in xattr code On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 17:22 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Alternatively we could add a iget_locked/drop_nlink/iput sequence to > ubifs_tnc_remove_ino(). But that will make unlink() much slower for > files > that contain xattrs. At that level we'd need to do it for every xattr, even those that were never be accessed, which would be slow indeed. But we really only need to check the inode cache: hey, icache, I am dying, and if you have any of my guys (xattrs), I want them to die with me. So the question is how to find our guys in the inode cache. I am not sure. Probably be we'd have to have our own list of cached inodes in the host inode, and maintain it. Artem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists