[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170515171912.6298-1-manfred@colorfullife.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 19:19:09 +0200
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: mtk.manpages@...il.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 1vier1@....de,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, fabf@...net.be,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Misc cleanups for ipc
Hi all,
could you check the following three patches?
As explained, I try to combine the changes for static analyzers and for
the randstruct gcc plugin with cleanups.
0001-ipc-sem.c-remove-sem_base-embed-struct-sem.patch:
sem_base is not needed. Instead of improving the casts,
remove it entirely.
0002-ipc-merge-ipc_rcu-and-kern_ipc_perm.patch
struct ipc_rcu and struct kern_ipc_perm are always used together.
Thus merge them.
0003-include-linux-sem.h-Correctly-document-sem_ctime.patch
Noticed by chance: The comment regarding sem_ctime is wrong/
misleading.
And man semctl(2) contains the same wrong comment.
Especially:
@Kees: Do the patches resolve all warnings?
@Andrew: Could you add them to your tree?
And can we still aim for 4.13?
@Michael:
Should we update man semctl(2)?
Several years ago, I did a review and found that sem_ctime is only
for Coherent the time of the last change...
http://calculix-rpm.sourceforge.net/sysvsem.html
--
Manfred
Powered by blists - more mailing lists