[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuJWhthBPaXPQg0Hv7+phSJmQrJj+4ND2_MNeKhzmVjRpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:59:07 -0700
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: remove self from GPIO maintainers
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
>>
>> I have not been able to dedicate time to the GPIO subsystem since quite
>> some time, and I don't see the situation improving in the near future.
>> Update the maintainers list to reflect this unfortunate fact.
>
> JFYI: we have a designated reviewer typo of status.
> I'm just wondering if it fits your case.
In practice that's basically what I was doing since I did not manage
any tree - just doing reviews and stuff. But that's precisely what I
cannot afford to do since a while, hence the withdrawal.
OTOH I agree it would be nice if a few people active on the GPIO list
could consider adding themselves as reviewers!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists