lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2017 14:12:10 -0400
From:   Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [v3 0/9] parallelized "struct page" zeroing

Hi Michal,

After looking at your suggested memblock_virt_alloc_core() change again, 
I decided to keep what I have. I do not want to inline 
memblock_virt_alloc_internal(), because it is not a performance critical 
path, and by inlining it we will unnecessarily increase the text size on 
all platforms.

Also, because it will be very hard to make sure that no platform 
regresses by making memset() default in _memblock_virt_alloc_core() (as 
I already showed last week at least sun4v SPARC64 will require special 
changes in order for this to work), I decided to make it available only 
for "deferred struct page init" case. As, what is already in the patch.

I am working on testing to make sure we do not need to double zero in 
the two cases that you found: sparsemem, and mem hotplug. Please let me 
know if you have any more comments, or if I can send new patches out 
when they are ready.

Thank you,
Pasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ