[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <741689b4-2e37-bdfe-5953-bb954fe5c35a@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 14:13:09 -0500
From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] sched/rt: minimize rq->lock contention in,
do_sched_rt_period_timer()
Peter, Ingo,
I sent this patch about a month ago and got no response.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9684545/
Does it seem reasonable? I'm not sure if taking rt_runtime_lock is
strictly necessary, but it's a big improvement to taking rq->lock every
pass through the loop. Is there another way to fix this?
Thanks,
Shaggy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists