[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <483aafb4-c864-058b-6e61-1189be427d27@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 21:34:33 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] coresight: etb10: Improve a size determination in
etb_alloc_buffer()
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
>> @@ -278,8 +278,7 @@ static void *etb_alloc_buffer(struct coresight_device *csdev, int cpu,
>> if (cpu == -1)
>> cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
>> -
>> - buf = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct cs_buffers), GFP_KERNEL, node);
>> + buf = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL, node);
>
> I'm fine with this change but if it's going to happen, it has to be in
> all the coresight drivers and not just this one - please respin with
> all instances fixed. One patch per driver would be much appreciated.
Do you imagine that any more modules are affected in a similar way
for this software area?
How do you think about other update suggestions from my selection
which are waiting for a corresponding review?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists