linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector probe helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 May 2017 08:47:49 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
        Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector
 probe helper

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 02:04:24PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Friday 12 May 2017 17:06:14 Jose Abreu wrote:
> > On 12-05-2017 10:35, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 May 2017 18:00:12 Jose Abreu wrote:
> > >> +		if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
> > >> +			mode->status = drm_mode_validate_connector(connector,
> > >> 
> > >>  								   mode);
> > > 
> > > I would reverse the arguments order to match the style of the other
> > > validation functions.
> > 
> > Hmm, I think it makes more sense to pass connector first and then
> > mode ...
> 
> I disagree, as this function validates a mode against a pipeline, the same way 
> the other validation functions validate a mode against other parameters, but 
> it's your patch :-)

Call it drm_connector_validate_mode, because the first argument is
generally the object we operate on :-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch